On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> > >
> > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils.
>
> An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more
> or less functional.
>
Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
Forgive me my ignorance, but I'd like a quick response: what about multiple
ethernet frames for IPX? Is it supported in -current? In -stable?
Thanks,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] United Commercial Bank,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
