On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

> Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> 
> The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> of it could be a port I think :)

        Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this 
means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.

        Other thoughts ?

--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to