On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest > of it could be a port I think :) Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port. Other thoughts ? -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Mike Smith
- RE: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Parag Patel
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd