"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > Why? What kernel code does this need? > The ncpfs kernel code for one. > We're talking about less than 500k of code here. > You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than > that. Try libreadline for starters. :) Bah like I care enough to care ;) If it has a fair amount of kernel code then its a good idea.. Also as you pointed out, it aids interoperability.. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- RE: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Mike Smith
- RE: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Parag Patel
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Parag Patel
- Re: NetWare client in -current Dominic Mitchell
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew Jacob
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew Hunt
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kevin Doherty
- Re: NetWare client in -current Warner Losh
- Re: NetWare client in -current Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov