In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: Hmm, this has me thinking again about suspend/resume. In the current
: context, can we expect a suspend veto from some function to actually
: DTRT? (ie. drivers that have been suspended get a resume call).
If the BIOS allows us to do that, yes. I'm fairly sure that doug did
the right thing here. The only issue that I ever ran into was that
the APM bios shut the machine down anyway, even when we tried to tell
it not to. Funny thing about batteries, or something like that:-)
: Or should we make two passes over the suspend method? One with "
: intention to suspend at this level", the second to actually perform the
: suspension once the first has been accepted?
No comment.
: This will allow non-ACPI-represented drivers to participate in
: determining which suspend level(s) can actually be supported by the
: hardware...
That's true.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message