Re: ACPI project progress report

[Garrett Wollman]

<<On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:07:26 -0700, Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Hmm, this has me thinking again about suspend/resume.  In the current 
> context, can we expect a suspend veto from some function to actually 
> DTRT? (ie. drivers that have been suspended get a resume call).

That's how I originally implemented it, but I'm not sure whether that
has been maintained or not.

> Or should we make two passes over the suspend method?  One with "
> intention to suspend at this level", the second to actually perform the 
> suspension once the first has been accepted?

I think this is a good idea, and better than my implementation.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message