Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>                         If it's something that can be done as eg. a KLD 
> we might want to do that instead, or through some other mechanism for 
> handling these sort of CPU quirks.

It sounds good.  If binary-format quriks is supported, we can supply
update modules for new CPU and newly found errata like the update
module for AMD K6-2 CPU of Windows 95.

-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
KATO Takenori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |        FreeBSD           |
Dept. Earth Planet. Sci, Nagoya Univ.          |    The power to serve!   |
Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan                        |  http://www.FreeBSD.org/ |
++++ FreeBSD(98) 4.0R-Rev. 01 available!       |http://www.jp.FreeBSD.org/|
++++ FreeBSD(98) 3.4R-Rev. 01 available!       +==========================+


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to