On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:43:05 -0800 Artem Belevich <fbsdl...@src.cx> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'm tinkering with DTrace syscall provider for COMPAT_FREEBSD32 and > linuxulator binaries and I wonder what would be the best way to name > those providers. Maybe a little bit related: do you know about my (unfortunately out-of-date) branch to add dtrace providers to the linuxulator? http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/user/netchild/linuxulator-dtrace/ If you are interested feel free to borrow things from there. > I'm leaning towards using 'module' but I would appreciate hackers@ > opinion on the best way to proceed. My first thought was that this is a good idea. My second thought was the question if you can make the provided values there compatible enough that a dtrace script is able to cope with it when someone does not uses a specific module but the wirldcard operator. If not I suggest to think again about it. Bye, Alexander. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
