on 21/12/2010 11:27 Artem Belevich said the following: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Artem Belevich <fbsdl...@src.cx> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the >>> tree. >> >> Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too. >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz > > Forgot to mention. The patch is against stable/8 r216436
The previous version applied fine to head, I think that that should be the case with this version too. I have one comment though. I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to syscall_freebsd.ko. Perhaps we could keep the old name? Or add a new module under that name that would load native syscall module and all emulation syscall modules (if any)? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
