On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic >> requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a >> resolved issue? > > 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for clang and our > in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge.
That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64-bit >> MIPS platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot loader work, >> and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. The base system >> seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, currently. > > Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to building > with xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it easy to > configure and add systree support, I think. Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just works" state with regard to this? Robert_______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
