Hi,

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Warner,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD.  This seems like a 
>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>  requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not 
>>>>>>>> yet a
>>>>>>>>  resolved issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge.  The world view for clang 
>>>>>>> and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build 
>>>>>> integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.  The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a little 
>>>>> different.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 
>>>>>>>> 64-bit MIPS platform.  We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot 
>>>>>>>> loader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year.  
>>>>>>>> The base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the 
>>>>>>>> above, currently.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes.  I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to 
>>>>>>> building with xdev compilers.  A similar number are needed to make it 
>>>>>>> easy to configure and add systree support, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just 
>>>>>> works" state with regard to this?
>>>>>
>>>>> I sure hope so.  I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan.
>>>>>
>>>> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ?
>>>
>>> It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree.  Needs about 4 
>>> hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting 
>>> busier than I expected.
>>>
>> any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final 
>> commit ?
>>
> ping ?
>
ping ?

 - Arnaud
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to