On 2012-Jul-04 19:10:08 -0400, Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> wrote: >My first thought was to suggest it be a port as well, but I'm not sure >that can be done sanely.
The easiest way is probably to implement some form of generic "command not found" hook into sh(1) and tcsh(1) - in interactive mode, if a specific function exists, execute it rather than reporting an error message . The actual functionality to map a command name to a port and suggest it to the user could nten be implemented separately as a port and the user would enable it by adding the appropriate function definition to their .profile/.login/.[t]cshrc files. Note that I'm not currently interested in this functionality and am not volunteering to implement it. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpLiwmiVDNPP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
