Mike Wade writes:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
> > bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
> > think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I
> > reported that it works without any problems under FreeBSD. Do we
> > really want to change that?
> Slightly off subject but with all the discussion about not Intel playing
> nicely with the FreeBSD developers... I've always had the best
> reliability, performance, and lower CPU usage with the Intel EtherExpress
> Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD (and Solaris x86 for that matter). Are there
> better cards out there that I should be looking at?
3C905
--
@BABOLO http://links.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
