At 11:43 AM 01/26/2001, Aleksandr A.Babaylov wrote:
>Mike Wade writes:
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > > Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
> > > bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
> > > think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I
> > > reported that it works without any problems under FreeBSD. Do we
> > > really want to change that?
> > Slightly off subject but with all the discussion about not Intel playing
> > nicely with the FreeBSD developers... I've always had the best
> > reliability, performance, and lower CPU usage with the Intel EtherExpress
> > Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD (and Solaris x86 for that matter). Are there
> > better cards out there that I should be looking at?
>3C905
I disagree. The if_fxp driver is far superior to the if_xl driver. In other
OS's your mileage may vary.
DB
>--
>@BABOLO http://links.ru/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
