> > is mkdir(3) guaranteed to be atomic? > > Yes. > > >Are there filesystem type cases where this might not be the case > >(NFS being my main concern ....) > > No. Yes. NFS doesn't guarantee atomicity, because it can't. If the mkdir call returns, you have no guarantee that the remote directory has been created (caching, errors, etc...) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Drew Eckhardt
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Mike Smith
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Peter Seebach
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?... Mike Smith
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Matt Dillon