In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes: >How would it *not* be atomic? Well, imagine a hypothetical broken system in which two simultaneous calls to mkdir, on some hypothetical broken filesystem, can each think that it "succeeded". After all, at the end of the operation, the directory has been created, so who's to say they're wrong? ;) -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Drew Eckhardt
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Mike Smith
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Peter Seebach
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?... Mike Smith
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Marc W
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Nate Williams
- Re: Is mkdir guaranteed to be 'atomic' ?? Matt Dillon