Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes: > > > Actually, all this talk does imply that VM objects should be independant > > of vnodes. Devices may need to mmap (requiring a VM object), but > > don't need all the baggage of a vnode. Julian is absolutely correct > > there. > > Well, you have other VM Objects which doesn't map to vnodes: swap > backed anonymous objects for instance. there has been talk of MAKING those have a vnode by making a swapfs. > -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 ---> X_.---._/ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: vm balance Matthew Dillon
- Re: vm balance Robert Watson
- Re: vm balance Matt Dillon
- Re: vm balance Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: vm balance Julian Elischer
- Re: vm balance Robert Watson
- Re: vm balance Matt Dillon
- Re: vm balance Robert Watson
- Re: vm balance Matt Dillon
- Re: vm balance Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: vm balance Julian Elischer
- Re: vm balance Boris Popov
- Re: vm balance Julian Elischer
- Re: vm balance Matt Dillon
- Re: vm balance Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: vm balance Poul-Henning Kamp
- Proposed struct file (was Re: vm balance) Matt Dillon
- Re: Proposed struct file (was Re: vm balance) Matt Dillon
- Re: Proposed struct file (was Re: vm balance) Terry Lambert
- Re: vm balance Terry Lambert
- Re: vm balance Matthew Dillon