On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Giorgos Verigakis wrote:
> >
> > The current scheme causes problems with TIME_WAIT recycling, which may
> > cause long delays in establishing new connections if you're connection to
> > the same host rapidly enough to cause TIME_WAIT recycling to be an issue.
> > This is why there's a huge spike only when you get to 1000 hits/second.
> >
> > There could be other reasons, of course, but this will overshadow the
> > others. I tested your test program with apache, and the change is
> > noticeable. So, hold off on further testing until later this week.
> >
> > Mike "Silby" Silbersack
>
> There's a second problem with your program too: It causes TIME_WAITs to
> pile up on the client side, which is not a well-handled situation for us.
> Use apachebench for future testing, it will automatically generate the
> stats you are looking for.
Yes tou are right on that, it was that on my system (the client) the
connections were closing after a few seconds and I hadn't noticed it.
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
