:Ok, time to take a good stab at sticking my foot in my mouth here. : :Would it be possible to have a kernel mode where the read-only bit was :turned on for malloc pools which shouldn't currently be accessed? This :could be gated through the spl() calls (or specific mutexes on -current), :ensuring that something like getpid couldn't stomp on the vm structures :w/o first doing a splvm(). Kinda sounds like Multics :-)... no, it would be too messy trying to protect kernel structures in one subsystem from another. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Ian Dowse
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Bernd Walter
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Mike Silbersack
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Bernd Walter
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Jeremy
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon