On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:14:34PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > FWIW, in a Unix port we did I remember putting the user > struct *above* the kernel stack. The stack grew down so you > hit the red zone (the guard pages) without clobbering the > user struct. Since struct user _ended_ on a page boundary, > its size was needed at locore.s assembly time but that was a > small price to pay for the added safety. I don't think a guard page can help here, because the page fault handler needs a working stack. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Ian Dowse
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any id... Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Ian Dowse
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any id... Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any id... Bernd Walter
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Mike Silbersack
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Bernd Walter
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any id... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer