Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > There are many effects that could cause this, for instance if FreeBSD > manages to align things differently in relation to the CPU cache you > could get some very interesting waste of time that way. > > Based on the data you show me, I can't really say that something is > wrong or right either way.
One thing that Linux does that we do not do is that they have different versions of libc compiled specifically for different cpu types, and at boot time set the correct paths. eg: /lib/i386/libc.so.6.whatever This means that Linux's glibc is using an i686 optimized bzero(), but the FreeBSD one is using an i386 optimized bzero(). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
