On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:26:51AM -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> > This could easily be hung off CPUTYPE like we do for the asm code in
> > OpenSSL, right?
> 
> That's not the point, you're proposing a static configuration
> which i honestly don't like.  What makes more sense is to
> teach the dynamic linker to look for archetecture specific
> subdirectories in order to dynamically link in a shared object
> more suited to the running CPU, not the CPU it was compiled on.

Yes, well, we already compile the *entire tree* with static
(compile-time) optimizations when CPUTYPE is set, so one more (bzero)
is no difference except that it gives an extra performance benefit.

Kris

Attachment: msg30098/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to