On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:09:06 -0600 GB Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:27:59 +0200 > Dimitar Peikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:01:58 -0800 (PST) > > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > he said -stable.. > > > > > > what are the malloc options on -stable? > > > > > > maybe we should make sure that they are null > > > > > > ln -s ">" /etc/malloc.conf > > > (I hope that helps) :) > > > > > > > I've tested it with : > > > > cc -O6 -o malloc_test malloc_test.c > > That -O6 does not look right from here. Do we support anything over -O2? > I've checked -O6 more complicated sources and they work just amazing! This is a GCC problem, not an OS specific feature. (I've use this and on Linux, OpenBSD, Solaris SPARC/Intel). Even if I compile it using -O2 the result is the same. FreeBSD machine always finish late! At this time I can't compare with Solaris, but OpenBSD got near the same performance. > And how about some source for malloc_test.c? The fact of running > something at -O6 started some bells ringing. > > > --SNIP-- > > GB > > -- > GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek > CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils? -- Dimitar Peikov Programmer Analyst Globalization Group "We Build e-Business" RILA Solutions 27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str. 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria phone: (+359 2) 9797320 phone: (+359 2) 9797300 fax: (+359 2) 9733355 http://www.rila.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
