On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:42:05 -0800 "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:09:06AM -0600, GB Clark wrote: > > > I've tested it with : > > > > > > cc -O6 -o malloc_test malloc_test.c > > > > That -O6 does not look right from here. Do we support anything over > > -O2? > > > > And how about some source for malloc_test.c? The fact of running > > something at -O6 started some bells ringing. > > Not us, but GCC does not support anything over -O3. -O4 and above are > treated as -O3. I *really* wish people would have a clue with with in > the hell they think they are achieving with -O<bignum>. Not all > optimizations are appropriate in all cases. And given this level of > optimization and the fact that the linux box is probably a different > version of GCC, I wonder how much of this could be due to the compiler. > > Please rerun your tests with '/usr/bin/time -l' on FreeBSD and however > you achieve the same on Linux. Sorry, no -l on Linux box! > > P.S. are you sure you are swapping, vs. paging? -- Dimitar Peikov Programmer Analyst Globalization Group "We Build e-Business" RILA Solutions 27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str. 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria phone: (+359 2) 9797320 phone: (+359 2) 9797300 fax: (+359 2) 9733355 http://www.rila.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
