On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:11:21PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Peter, here is a bit reworked version of your patch. > > > Does it look reasonable? > > > > Yes, this looks fine; the data connection port issue was brought up by > > Matthew Seaman in a private message to me, which I did not respond to > > immediately, because I wanted to feel the general thoughts on the > > subject. Now that you have incorporated it into your patch, it all > > sounds great :) > > Thanks! > > > I see that you have also changed my '.Nm' macro for the 'ftp' service to > > '.Dq'; that's fine too, I was in quite a bit of doubt myself over > > exactly which mdoc macro to use. The '.Nm' came from the telnet(1) > > manual page, but it did not look quite right to me. > > As far as I know mdoc, .Nm should be used once with an argument, > the subject of the page, and then it may be used with no argument > to refer to the subject since it remembers its argument. > Therefore excuse me, but your using ".Nm ftp" in the middle of the > page to refer to "ftp" as a TCP service wasn't quite correct :-)
Yes, I know it wasn't; but a quick test revealed that at least with -STABLE's groff, '.Nm ftp' used in the middle of the ftpd manual page did not influence the further calls of '.Nm' without arguments - all the rest of the page correctly displayed 'ftpd' at each '.Nm' usage. Still, it was not correct, and I freely admit it :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 You have, of course, just begun reading the sentence that you have just finished reading.
msg39382/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
