Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-07-25T06:06:01Z, Diomidis Spinellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You still have the overhead of two nc instances copying data and context > > switching. > Forgive my ignorance, but is that significantly higher than two /bin/sh > instances copying data and context switching?
When the shell connects two local processes with a pipe it just redirects the output of the one and the input of the other to the two ends of a pipe(2) IPC abstraction and leaves them to communicate with each other simply wait(2)ing until they finish. The shell does not shuffle the data between the two processes. The same can also be done when connecting a local process with a remote process through a socket(2); there is no need for an intermediary, and this is what I have implemented. Diomidis - http://www.spinellis.gr _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
