Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. [...]
Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you
referring to booting from a network image/server? That's an
interesting idea. I'm fairly new to FreeBSD development also,
and prefer the speed of a dedicated box, but recently suffered
my first corrupted beyond repair system.
Yes, a "diskless" boot is a network-based boot :-)
Look into BOOTP for that:
<http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-diskless.html>.
You may want to just use vmware (best reliable solution, IMO but it
costs money), depending on what resources you have on hand and what
you're trying to accomplish.
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
