In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@btinternet.com>, Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
typed:
> > There is a
> > reason why people have been discussing this for ten years without
> > getting anywhere.
> I suspect that is because that by and large the ports system works ;-) -
> Having
> Played around with a couple of Linux distributions - my impression is that
> "ports"
> offers a much more manageable approach or maybe I am just used to ports ;-)
You may want to look at some other Linux distros. The packages system
dates to about the same era as rpm/debs. The package system is much,
much more manageable than them. On the other hand, most Linux distros
have moved beyond those tools, to things like yum, apt-get and
up2date. Those incorporate the facilities that rpm and debs are
missing in a higher-level tool, and I think they are slightly more
manageable than freebsd packages.
As far as I know, none of them handle updates from source at all. In
fact, dealing with sources seems to be a noticable weakness for them.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
