-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Mike Meyer: >> If the only thing preventing that was their OSS license terms, I'd be >> surprised if they wouldn't at least consider relaxing them for >> FreeBSD. > > Perforce has already been thought as a replacement (back in 2000 when p4 > was introduced) but it will not be able to deal with ports and even on > projects right now, we have issues with too many client views/changesets. Ports 2.0 is using aegis (aegis.sf.net)... any possibility for wider use? Note: I am in the middle of making it FreeBSD friendly and beefing up the automated portions of distributed repos
- -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHo6SkQi2hk2LEXBARAqFtAJ9fJ6zTzIdX10ZssmxZ3UApdD9XdgCeOA0F UKmqt5DZY0AFVA0ST/3QcU8= =CcGt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
