on 04/02/2008 22:07 Pav Lucistnik said the following:
> Julian Elischer píše v po 04. 02. 2008 v 10:36 -0800:
>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> More on the problem with reading big directories on UDF.
>> You do realise that you have now made yourself the official
>> maintainer of the UDF file system by submitting a competent
>> and insightful analysis of the problem?
> 
> Yay, and can you fix the sequential read performance while you're at it?
> Kthx!
> 

Pav,

this was almost trivial :-)
See the attached patch, first hunk is just for consistency.
The code was borrowed from cd9660, only field/variable names are adjusted.

But there is another issue that I also mentioned in the email about
directory reading. It is UDF_INVALID_BMAP case of udf_bmap_internal,
i.e. the case when file data is embedded into a file entry.
This is a special case that needs to be handled differently.
udf_readatoffset() handles it, but the latest udf_read code doesn't.
I have a real UDF filesystem where this type of allocation is used for
small files and those files can not be read.

This is described in Part 4, section 14.6.8 of ECMA-167.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
--- udf_vnops.c.orig	2008-01-29 23:50:49.000000000 +0200
+++ udf_vnops.c	2008-02-05 01:30:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -851,7 +846,7 @@ udf_bmap(struct vop_bmap_args *a)
 	if (a->a_runb)
 		*a->a_runb = 0;
 
-	error = udf_bmap_internal(node, a->a_bn * node->udfmp->bsize, &lsector,
+	error = udf_bmap_internal(node, a->a_bn << node->udfmp->bshift, &lsector,
 	    &max_size);
 	if (error)
 		return (error);
@@ -859,9 +854,27 @@ udf_bmap(struct vop_bmap_args *a)
 	/* Translate logical to physical sector number */
 	*a->a_bnp = lsector << (node->udfmp->bshift - DEV_BSHIFT);
 
-	/* Punt on read-ahead for now */
-	if (a->a_runp)
-		*a->a_runp = 0;
+	/*
+	 * Determine maximum number of readahead blocks following the
+	 * requested block.
+	 */
+	if (a->a_runp) {
+		off_t fsize;
+		int nblk;
+
+		fsize = le64toh(node->fentry->inf_len);
+		nblk = (fsize >> node->udfmp->bshift) - (a->a_bn + 1);
+		if (nblk <= 0)
+			*a->a_runp = 0;
+		else if (nblk >= (MAXBSIZE >> node->udfmp->bshift))
+			*a->a_runp = (MAXBSIZE >> node->udfmp->bshift) - 1;
+		else
+			*a->a_runp = nblk;
+	}
+
+	if (a->a_runb) {
+		*a->a_runb = 0;
+	}
 
 	return (0);
 }
--- udf_vfsops.c.orig	2007-03-13 03:50:24.000000000 +0200
+++ udf_vfsops.c	2008-02-05 01:29:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -330,6 +330,11 @@ udf_mountfs(struct vnode *devvp, struct 
 
 	bo = &devvp->v_bufobj;
 
+	if (devvp->v_rdev->si_iosize_max != 0)
+		mp->mnt_iosize_max = devvp->v_rdev->si_iosize_max;
+	if (mp->mnt_iosize_max > MAXPHYS)
+		mp->mnt_iosize_max = MAXPHYS;
+
 	/* XXX: should be M_WAITOK */
 	MALLOC(udfmp, struct udf_mnt *, sizeof(struct udf_mnt), M_UDFMOUNT,
 	    M_NOWAIT | M_ZERO);
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to