On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:07:44AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You fail to understand the complex interplay of politics here. These > people do not want to see beyond it. They want to shut you down > because you aren't using their beloved Linux. They use stupid excuses > to not do things. This is about removing barriers to entry. This > isn't about being popular. .. > : Um, if FreeBSD has to become GNU in order to win GNU users, what's the > : point? Skip the pain, switch to GNU, and get the popularity you want > : and the platform you deserve with no delay. > > Hello? BSDL calling. You left your GPL here and we don't want it.
For some of these uses of FreeBSD - I really have to wonder if GNU/kFreeBSD (Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is a port that consists of GNU userland using the GNU C library on top of FreeBSD's kernel) isn't a better choice. http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ One can keep their kernel changes private IP without worry. I doubt most companies would claim they have IP that needs protecting in their GNU userland changes. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
