On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:01:28 +0100, krad wrote > 2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt <r...@robert-eckardt.de> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt > > <robert.ecka...@robert-eckardt.de> wrote: > > > > Do I have to be worried? > > > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation? > > > Why is used space growing slower than free space is shrinking? > > > Is there some garbage collection needed in ZFS? > > > > > > Besides, although the backup server has 3 GB RAM I had to tune arc_max > > > to 150MB to copy the backed-up data from an 2.8TB ZFS (v6) to the > > > 4.5 TB ZFS (v13) by "zfs send|zfs recv" without kmalloc panic. > > > (I.e., the defaults algorithm was not sufficient.) > >
> do a " zfs list -t all" > > you will see all snapshots and zvols then as well Uups, sorry for asking. Everything o.k. after "zfs destroy big/b...@backup" :-( I hope the info on arc_max will stay useful. Regards, Robert -- Dr. Robert Eckardt --- robert.ecka...@robert-eckardt.de _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
