On Monday 07 May 2007 19:05:31 Kirk Davis wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > in -current you can implement a routing table via FWD and tables. > > in 6.x you need to specify the next hop. and an more explicit rule. > > Is there any information floating around on how to do this in current > using the FWD rules and tables? Any pointer on where to look. > > Right now I am using fwd rules on our BGP router (Quagga & FreeBSD > 6.2) to force one of our subnets out a particular interface and avoid > the routing table but I would prefer to do it more like a dual routing > table where I can make more routing decisions than just forcing all > packets from that subnet out the interface. I could test it on one of > our current boxes. >
I do not know enough about quagga but if you really run BGP and quagga does what BGP is supposed to do I wuold say you shoudl use policy route-map filters for that purpose João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
