Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a question: Is the output from "ipfw list" supposed
> > to be in the same rule format that is accepted as input?
> > If that's the case, then there is a small bug:
> >
> > # ipfw add 100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or 2.2.2.2 '}'
> > 00100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or dst-ip 2.2.2.2 '}'
>
> ok this should be fixed now in head (revision 205179)
Great, thank you very much for doing this!
Do you think this could be merged to stable/8 and stable/7?
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"C++ is to C as Lung Cancer is to Lung."
-- Thomas Funke
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
