Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just a question: Is the output from "ipfw list" supposed > > to be in the same rule format that is accepted as input? > > If that's the case, then there is a small bug: > > > > # ipfw add 100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or 2.2.2.2 '}' > > 00100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or dst-ip 2.2.2.2 '}' > > ok this should be fixed now in head (revision 205179)
Great, thank you very much for doing this! Do you think this could be merged to stable/8 and stable/7? Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "C++ is to C as Lung Cancer is to Lung." -- Thomas Funke _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"