03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" <smi...@nimnet.asn.au>: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't > > work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), > > Now I see that its just 'not supported' I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is. Should work on HEAD now (r286232).
> > > > It may be my imagination but (distant) past? > > I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may > misremember remembering .. I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted "ranged" queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion support in SVN. > > On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only > 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
