On 8/3/15 10:50 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" <smi...@nimnet.asn.au>:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
> work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
> Now I see that its just 'not supported'
I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is.
Should work on HEAD now (r286232).
great!
Pitty I'm stuck working on 8.0 :-) maybe I can back-port it.
>
> It may be my imagination but (distant) past?
I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may
misremember remembering ..
I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted
"ranged" queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion
support in SVN.
On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only
600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts.
cheers, Ian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
