The following reply was made to PR kern/127528; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/127528: [icmp]: icmp socket receives icmp replies not owned
 by the process.
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:11:05 -0400

 Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 >> Old Synopsis: icmp socket receives icmp replies not owned by the 
 >> process.
 >> New Synopsis: [icmp]: icmp socket receives icmp replies not owned by 
 >> the process.
 >>   
 >
 > This PR is bogus because:
 > ICMP has no concept of datagrams being "owned" by a process. There is 
 > no field in the ICMP protocol which differentiates ICMP "sessions" on 
 > a per-process basis, and this is because ICMP has no concept of 
 > "sessions" -- ICMP messages are directed at IP endpoints.
 
 ICMP echo and echo replies do have "sessions" of sorts, at least unique 
 identifying fields - identifier and sequence number.
 
 This was opened by a pfSense maintainer because it's a change in 
 behavior from 6.x releases where this was never an issue, and is 
 something we feel is a regression.
 
 Ideally you don't want to be pinging the same host from two different 
 processes, but it's difficult to avoid in some circumstances and it's 
 something that always worked fine prior to FreeBSD 7.0.
 
 Thanks,
 Chris
 
 _______________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to