> 
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Li, Qing <qing...@bluecoat.com> wrote:
> >> * In a way this is a good thing as in6_lltable_prefix_free() is
> >> guaranteed to crash your kernel in two different ways, and that's
> not
> >> counting the race conditions that it's subject to.
> >>
> >
> >        Could you please elaborate with some details on the two
> different
> >        ways in6_lltable_prefix_free() crashes the kernel
> definitively ?
> 
> First, it calls callout_drain on lle->le_timer, but that is never
> initialized for a v6 llentry.  Second, it never stops the ln_timer_ch
> callout before it frees the llentry.  Third, it modifies the lltable
> without holding IF_AFDATA_LOCK(in.c has the third problem: see the
> -net discussion about kern/165863).


1. The reference to &lle->la_timer instead of ln_timer_ch is fine 
   because lle_timer is defined as a union.


2. The manpage of "callout_drain()" reads 

 "The function callout_drain() is identical to callout_stop() except
  that it will wait for the callout to be completed if it is already
  in progress."

3. wrt IF_AFDATA_LOCK() I will check again.


--Qing


_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to