On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > his ipfw2 is ok for test now. > http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html > i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's email > list. > and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in > freebsd? it is what he said.
i don't think he ever said that, and in any case the code seems to be taken straight from the 2002 freebsd version so i highly doubt there is any speed difference (let alone a measurable one with packets going through the kernel stack; to see an actual performance difference you'd need to run the code through netmap or some high speed framework) see http://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ cheers luigi > sure i will test it by myself. > thanks > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 <byc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD and >> totally not new create things, IMHO* >> >> *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the basic >> NAT and it works in my lab environment.* >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> i agree, >>> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. >>> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular >>> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw >>> >>> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said their >>> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these important >>> features >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: >>> > >>> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! >>> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ >>> > >>> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why >>> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience >>> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: >>> > >>> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=ipfw§ion=ANY >>> > >>> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later >>> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? >>> > >>> > cheers, Ian >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ありがとう >>> 佐藤柯德 >>> Sato K. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> > > -- > ありがとう > 佐藤柯德 > Sato K. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"