hi ok. i will test it. but he said it is faster 2014-12-15 15:26 GMT+08:00 Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it>: > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > hi, > > his ipfw2 is ok for test now. > > http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html > > i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's email > > list. > > and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in > > freebsd? it is what he said. > > i don't think he ever said that, and in any case the code seems to be > taken straight from the 2002 freebsd version so i highly doubt there > is any speed difference (let alone a measurable one with packets > going through the kernel stack; to see an actual performance difference > you'd need to run the code through netmap or some high speed framework) > > see http://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ > > cheers > luigi > > > sure i will test it by myself. > > thanks > > > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 <byc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD and > >> totally not new create things, IMHO* > >> > >> *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the basic > >> NAT and it works in my lab environment.* > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> i agree, > >>> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. > >>> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular > >>> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw > >>> > >>> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said > their > >>> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these > important > >>> features > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! > >>> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > >>> > > >>> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering > why > >>> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience > >>> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: > >>> > > >>> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=ipfw§ion=ANY > >>> > > >>> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later > >>> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? > >>> > > >>> > cheers, Ian > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ありがとう > >>> 佐藤柯德 > >>> Sato K. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > ありがとう > > 佐藤柯德 > > Sato K. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- > Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione > http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa > TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 > Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- >
-- ありがとう 佐藤柯德 Sato K. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
