On 04/14/2018 03:49 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> If you go into ncl_getattrcache() {it's in sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clsubs.c}
> and add a printf() for "time_second" and "np->n_mtime.tv_sec" near the
> top, where it calculates "timeo" from it.
> Running this hacked kernel might show you if either of these fields is bogus.
> (You could then printf() "timeo" and "np->n_attrtimeo" just before the "if"
> clause that increments "attrcache_misses", which is where the cache misses
> happen to see why it is missing the cache.)
> If you could do this for the 10.3 kernel as well, this might indicate why the
> miss rate has increased?
I just checked the code to see if I can figure out where exactly I have
to put the printf(). And then I saw that there are ifdefs for
NFS_ACDEBUG which seems to be a kernel option. When I add NFS_ACDEBUG in
the config-file for the kernel, the build fails with an
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/ACDEBUG: unknown option "NFS_ACDEBUG"
I looked in sysctl.h and there it isn't defined. Do I do something wrong
or did this sysctl-tunable got lost at some point in time?
Can I just use this code by removing the ifdef for getting information?
Sorry, my C is not really existent, thus I have to ask :/
The parts (except the part that looks at the sysctl looks like this):
#ifdef NFS_ACDEBUG
if (nfs_acdebug>1)
printf("ncl_getattrcache: initial timeo = %d\n", timeo);
#endif
……
#ifdef NFS_ACDEBUG
if (nfs_acdebug > 2)
printf("acregmin %d; acregmax %d; acdirmin %d; acdirmax
%d\n",
nmp->nm_acregmin, nmp->nm_acregmax,
nmp->nm_acdirmin, nmp->nm_acdirmax);
if (nfs_acdebug)
printf("ncl_getattrcache: age = %d; final timeo = %d\n",
(time_second - np->n_attrstamp), timeo);
#endif
I would remove the ifdefs and the "if (nfs_acdebug …)"
Niels
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
