freebsd-net  

Messages by Thread

• • [Bug 277849] [bge] panic when attaching if_bge on Supermicro H13SSL-N bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 277849] [bge] panic when attaching if_bge on Supermicro H13SSL-N bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 277849] [bge] panic when attaching if_bge on Supermicro H13SSL-N bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 277849] [bge] panic when attaching if_bge on Supermicro H13SSL-N bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282431] Chelsio T540-CR: t5nex0: command 0x16 in mbox 4 timed out (0x4014c010). bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282434] LOR: tcphash vs rib head lock bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282434] LOR: tcphash vs rib head lock bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282434] LOR: tcphash vs rib head lock bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 38554] changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 38554] changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 38554] changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 38554] changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 183407] [rc.d] Routing restart returns non-zero exitcode in case of no extra routing parameter or missing atm/ipx bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 183407] [rc.d] Routing restart returns non-zero exitcode in case of no extra routing parameter or missing atm/ipx bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 61744] [tcp] TCP hangs onto mbufs with no tcp data unnecessily under certain error conditions bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 61744] [tcp] TCP hangs onto mbufs with no tcp data unnecessily under certain error conditions bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 266735] Getting Lock order reversal: bpf global lock, iflib ctx lock error when booting machine bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 171228] [re] if_re - eeprom write issues bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 171228] [re] if_re - eeprom write issues bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 192558] hard-to-hit crash in bpf catchpacket() bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 281938] Make sure max_len is not 0 before using it as modulo bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 281938] Make sure max_len is not 0 before using it as modulo bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 281938] Make sure max_len is not 0 before using it as modulo bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 173002] [net] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 173002] [net] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 173002] [net] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 173002] [net] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 173002] [net] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 218687] use uninitialized fields of struct inpcb bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 218687] use uninitialized fields of struct inpcb bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 236219] netmap bug pf set prio bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 230807] if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networking E2200 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 230807] if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networking E2200 bugzilla-noreply
• Rustls and ktls Alan Somers
• [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282378] panic: got NULL turnstile on rwlock 0xfffff8021123be90 passedv 1 v 1 bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282374] kernel panic on boot with Chelsio T320 installed bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282374] kernel panic on boot with Chelsio T320 installed bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282373] kernel panic on boot with Chelsio T320 installed bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282373] kernel panic on boot with Chelsio T320 installed bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 261129] IPv6 default route vanishes with rtadvd/rtsold bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 261129] IPv6 default route vanishes with rtadvd/rtsold bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 271205] [ix] [carp]: Continuous input errors on Intel X553 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271205] [ix] [carp]: Continuous input errors on Intel X553 bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 268092] ixgbe: if_ixv driver have mismatched Rx buffer size and rx_mbuf_sz bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 268092] ixgbe: if_ixv driver have mismatched Rx buffer size and rx_mbuf_sz bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 277038] igc driver accesses hardware resources after they are released. bugzilla-noreply
• Re: TCP Success Story (was Re: TCP_RACK, TCP_BBR, and firewalls) void
• Chelsio / cxlv(4): strange messages, SR-IOV interface does not work Lexi Winter
  • Re: Chelsio / cxlv(4): strange messages, SR-IOV interface does not work Navdeep Parhar
  • Re: Chelsio / cxlv(4): strange messages, SR-IOV interface does not work Lexi Winter
• panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Peter Holm
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Michael Tuexen
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Peter Holm
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Michael Tuexen
  • panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Kyle Evans
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Zhenlei Huang
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Michael Tuexen
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Ronald Klop
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Michael Tuexen
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Kyle Evans
  • Re: panic: tcp_do_segment: sent too much Michael Tuexen
• [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279653] Page fault in in6_selecthlim bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 255678] security/strongswan cant add routes via RTM_ADD via PF_ROUTE socket bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 271270] bnxt(4): kernel crash during kldunload bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282168] vtnet(4): panic in if_attach_internal() when kldloading bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282140] igc(4): Wake on LAN not working with Intel I226-V and GENERIC Kernel bugzilla-noreply
• pf for netgraph jails? Palle Girgensohn
  • Re: pf for netgraph jails? Patrick M. Hausen
  • Re: pf for netgraph jails? Palle Girgensohn
  • Re: pf for netgraph jails? Patrick M. Hausen
  • Re: pf for netgraph jails? Aleksandr Fedorov
  • Re: pf for netgraph jails? Marek Zarychta
• [Bug 278100] ena (Elastic Network Adapter) driver memory leak on detach bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 278100] ena (Elastic Network Adapter) driver memory leak on detach bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 278100] ena (Elastic Network Adapter) driver memory leak on detach bugzilla-noreply
• Re: in_pcbbind_setup: wrong condition regarding INP_REUSEPORT ? Mark Johnston
• [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 282095] enic breaks when changing MTU on interfaces with fib other than 0 bugzilla-noreply
• Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Cheng Cui
  • Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge void
  • Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Cheng Cui
• [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • Re: [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) Santiago Martinez
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) bugzilla-noreply
• RFC: mbuf: Add m_len assertion to mtod() and mtodo() Igor Ostapenko
• Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative Cy Schubert
  • Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative David Chisnall
• [Bug 281125] ixl: fix multicast filters handling regression bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 256850] poor mac address distribution for if_tap bugzilla-noreply
• [Bug 279850] wireguard: wg(8) fails on INET6-only kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279850] wireguard: wg(8) fails on INET6-only kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279850] wireguard: wg(8) fails on INET6-only kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279850] wireguard: wg(8) fails on INET6-only kernel bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 279850] wireguard: wg(8) fails on INET6-only kernel bugzilla-noreply
• Traffic between cxgbe VFs and/or PF on a host John Nielsen
  • Re: Traffic between cxgbe VFs and/or PF on a host Navdeep Parhar
  • Re: Traffic between cxgbe VFs and/or PF on a host John Nielsen
• AMD Pensando Pollara 400 GbE Ultra Ethernet Tomek CEDRO
• [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked bugzilla-noreply
• Goings on in the Network Stack Tom Jones
• How does the TCP measurement period work? Alan Somers
  • Re: How does the TCP measurement period work? Michael Tuexen
  • Re: How does the TCP measurement period work? Alan Somers
  • Re: How does the TCP measurement period work? Michael Tuexen
• [Bug 255309] ice(4) driver doesn't use RSS option correctly bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 255309] ice(4) driver doesn't use RSS option correctly bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 255309] ice(4) driver doesn't use RSS option correctly bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 255309] ice(4) driver doesn't use RSS option correctly bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 255309] ice(4) driver doesn't use RSS option correctly bugzilla-noreply

• Earlier messages
• Later messages