On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Bruce Evans wrote:
|On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|> This was first posted on freebsd-question, but I could not find
|> the solution yet.
|> Maybe you could help me.
|
|Maybe a little. I don't use 5.4...
It happens on 5.3 also. Not tested on 4.x.
|> I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a new machine with the following
|> hardware:
|>
|> Asus P4P800 SE (BIOS v. 1008)
|> 2GB RAM ( 4x 512 DDR400 )
|> 2 HDD Samsung SP0802N (80GB 7200rpm ata-100) 80 pins cable.
|>
|> The HD were formated with newfs defaults, and the following
|> results were the same using both as master (primary e secondary) or with a
|> master / slave (same interface).
|>
|> With diskinfo both performance are the same, but with "dd", the
|> second disc (the slave or the secondary master), is always worst as if it
|> were working in DMA2.
|
|I remember a commit to the ata driver to fix misprogramming of DMA timing
|on an Intel chipset for devices and/or channels other than the first. I'm
|not sure if 5.4 has the bug or the fix.
It seems that the bug is still there.
|diskinfo only tests reading, and you only showed a dd test using writing
|(to a file), so the problem is apparently only that writing to the second
|drive is slow.
Right.
|> what should be the right results?
|
|Swap the devices to see if it is a drive problem (unlikely with the
|same model of drive but... I have one system that apparently has
|worse timing on the secondary channel. This showed up as writes
|causing subsequent reads to be slow -- apparently the writes caused
|some errors and error correction as perfect except for slowing things
|down).
I´d already did it. It´s not a hardware problem. Always happen on
the second drive, no matter which is it.
- Marcelo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
