在 2005-08-08一的 03:15 +0200，Suleiman Souhlal写道： > Hello, > > On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some > > feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we > > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. > > In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without > HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance > of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD. > You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/ > compare_tiger-3.html . > It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never > slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster.
Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks slower than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEAD? Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
