Hello,
On Aug 8, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Xin LI wrote:
在 2005-08-08一的 03:15 +0200，Suleiman Souhlal写道：
Hello,
On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some
feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we
should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy.
In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without
HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance
of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD.
You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/
stuff/
compare_tiger-3.html .
It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never
slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster.
Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks
slower
than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEAD?
I'm not sure, but I ran the benchmark on the same kernel several
times (after rebooting), and as gnn noticed, it seems like there is a
high variance for the tests that have 128k size things. Something
must be going on at those sizes.
The results are at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/
compare_HEAD.html
--
Suleiman Souhlal | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Project | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
