On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:18:01 +0100 "O. Hartmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I complain about the dramatic performance drainage of FreeBSD and > would also say, that my main purpose for an UNIX driven box isn't the > service for network like routing, DNS and others. But I'm frightened by > the poor network performance when I have MPI in vi> OK, but DNS queries are short (less than 1 KB). You probably know much better than me (I also work with scientific computing, but it's been only 4 years) that you can't expect terrific performance with thousands of messages per second -- this will always be your bottleneck. As such, I believe it's unfair (and imprecise) to use DNS performance results for a group communication (MPI) environment comparison. I had good experiences with MPI + FreeBSD, although don't have numbers to prove. Regards. :) -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED],wait4.org}> Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse." _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
