On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote: > I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no improvement > I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem > value. > > Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely > nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is > disappointing. > > Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work > well on 6.2?
Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? Kris
pgpf9YhNK1TS7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
