Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0200, Michel Santos wrote: >> >> Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem: >> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote: >> > >> >> I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no >> >> improvement >> >> I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher >> >> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem >> >> value. >> >> >> >> Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely >> >> nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is >> >> disappointing. >> >> >> >> Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not >> work >> >> well on 6.2? >> > >> > Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? >> > >> > Kris >> > >> >> Yes, if you used to squid I am running the last 2.5-Stable14 version >> which >> run best on 4.11 > > OK, please provide further details of your system configuration > (dmesg, kernel config). >
I have two server, the main server is a Supermicro Dualcore Dual Opteron and the backup is a Athlon64 X2, both with 4GB The disks are the same, only the onboard SCSI is Adaptec and the other is LSI. Funny is that I have no difference regarding the disk read performance wether I use the Opteron machine or the other dmesg Opteron http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/dmesg.sm dmesg X2 http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/dmesg.x2 kernel config http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/kernel62 thank you Michel computador é como nem cavalo e mulher mais que montam neles, pior que ficam ... **************************************************** Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais. **************************************************** _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
