On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:48:22 -0700
David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to have a low impact on the system being measured (of course),
> and I was unwilling to require that a system to be measured had any
> software installed on it other than base FreeBSD. (Yes, that means I
> didn't assume Perl, though in practice in this environment, each does.)
Out of curiosity, how does bsnmpd compare to your approach with regards to
impact on the system. It is part of 7.0 , not sure about previous versions, and
it is definitely a more standard and cross platform approach , with support @
NOC / alerting side of things.
(for what is worth, i've only used net-snmpd , not bsnmpd )...
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to
reform." Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
