On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:39:27AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > ... > > Also, the only times I have used SNMP, it has been using a version that > > did not support encryption in any form (as for as I know), and since > > some of the transit was over facilities we don't control, I thought it > > would be a bit more sensible to use SSH for the transport. > > but do you use encryption with your current system?
Since it uses SSH for transport, yes. And it uses authentication, too (for the same reason). > [...] > > Mind, I'm not especially keen on re-inventing stuff that already works > > (or can be reasonably persuaded to work). But in this case, running an > > SNMP daemon seemed to fail to meet my (admittedly, somewhat self- > > imposed) requirements. > > hey , your requirements are yours :) I was just curious to know why snmp didnt > cut it. Fair enough. :-} Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpBiDxsYyaXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature