2008/11/25 Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 12:06 PM 11/25/2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> 2% may not sound like a lot but it starts becoming measurable savings
>> when the number of boxes involved is ${LARGE}.
>
> True, but then again is there such a thing as a synthetic benchmark that
> would have a margin of error less than 2% while representing your real world
> application mix?It depends, what do you think people read when making decisions? :) Bout the only thing that could fix this is for people involved with FreeBSD to re-do the benchmark, documenting how it was done wrong, and reporting on the results. Note that I didn't say "show FreeBSD is better", at least not in the initial round. Adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
